Tangled up in inquiry: Documenting pre-service science teachers' perspectives on inquiry as they reflect on the process of planning and teaching inquiry-based lessons
by Horvath, Lawrence Charles, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, 2008, 154 pages; 3350733

Abstract:

This dissertation focused on 13 preservice science teachers' own perspectives on inquiry and how those perspectives developed in the context of being required to engage their students in inquiry-based science during their student teaching. The questions guiding this research were (a) What are preservice science teachers' perspectives on inquiry? (b) What happens to preservice science teachers' perspectives on inquiry as they enact and systematically reflect on inquiry? (c) What factors do preservice science teachers identify as influencing their perspectives on inquiry in the context of planning and teaching inquiry-based lessons? Ten criteria for inquiry emerged out of the data. Two distinct perspectives on inquiry were identified within these 10 criteria, a procedurally-connected perspective and a procedurally-unconnected perspective. Analysis framed through these two perspectives showed that 7 of the preservice science teachers' perspectives shifted in the context of planning, teaching and reflecting on inquiry-based science. Six of the preservice teachers did not demonstrate shifts. Three of the preservice science teachers who shifted perspectives were chosen for further analysis. All 3 preservice science teachers were found to have constructed a more robust view of inquiry. Yet each preservice science teacher also described experiencing and engaging with inquiry in relation to her own unique set of instructional contexts. These findings suggest that requiring preservice teachers to plan, implement, and reflect on inquiry-based teaching could create a rich space for science teacher educators to engage with preservice teachers around their developing understandings of inquiry.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
SourceDAI/A 70-03, p. , May 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsTeacher education; Secondary education; Science education
Publication Number3350733
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3350733
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.