"Tough boss" or workplace bully?: A grounded theory study of insights from Human Resource professionals
by Daniel, Teresa Ann, Ph.D., FIELDING GRADUATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 260 pages; 3350585


This qualitative study explored the way in which Human Resource (HR) professionals describe the phenomenon of workplace bullying—and how they distinguish bullying from situations where a manager is simply operating as a "tough boss." In-depth interviews were conducted with HR practitioners working in the United States, and followed a semi-structured format. The data were analyzed based on constructivist grounded theory methodology, using constant comparative analysis.

Specifically, the participants described workplace bullies as typically being unfair and inconsistent, subject to frequent emotional outbursts, misusing their power and authority, and operating with a personally-motivated focus (often without regard to the legitimate business interests of their organization). Their actions at work were interpreted as being predominantly negative , including: intimidation, threats, exploitation, control, humiliation/embarrassment, a failure to communicate, manipulation, ostracizing or ignoring employees, engaging in a pattern of obstructive behavior, and gossiping or spreading rumors.

Conversely, participants described "tough bosses" as typically being objective and fair, self-controlled, results-oriented, and organizationally-focused. Their actions at work were interpreted as predominantly positive, including: interactive, two-way communication, mentoring and tutoring their subordinates, and engaging in fair and honest conflict intended to resolve issues and problems in the best interest of their organization.

As a result of these findings, a new theory—expressed as a conceptual model—was developed which suggested that it is the presence or absence of malice that is determinative in the evaluation of whether or not a conflict situation at work is workplace bullying.

Key words: bully, workplace bully, workplace bullying, mobbing, malice, constructivist grounded theory

AdviserMiguel Guilarte
SourceDAI/A 70-03, May 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3350585
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.