Decision-making and depressive symptomatology
by Leykin, Yan, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2008, 90 pages; 3346155

Abstract:

Difficulty with making decisions is one of the features of depressive illness. However, the particulars of decision-making in individuals suffering from depression are poorly understood. In this thesis, the relationship between depression and decision-making was explored in three studies, conducted both on the Internet, with participants recruited from the Internet community, and in person, using college undergraduates. The studies focused on two aspects of decision-making: (1) general approach to decisions, including initial reactions to decision, styles of decision-making, and self-perception as a decision-maker, and (2) decisional effectiveness, or the ability to make use of good decision-making strategies to arrive at a choice that is in the decider's best interest.

When participants were prompted to examine decisions carefully, the productivity of decisions was unrelated to the level of depressive symptoms; depressed individuals were also not more likely to have any particular decision-related goals. However, when prompts for careful consideration of decisions were not present, depressed individuals made inferior choices. They were found to use fewer productive decision-making strategies, and were less likely to learn from their past experiences in similar situations. Level of depressive symptoms was also related to approaches to decisions and styles of decision-making. Depressed individuals became more anxious when faced with a decision, and preferred to remain passive, procrastinating or avoiding decisions. Finally, they were more likely to think poorly of their abilities as decision-makers and to not trust their intuitions. The results suggest that the failure to use adaptive decision-making strategies spontaneously is an important factor in determining the poor quality of the choices made by depressed individuals, and that prompting the use of such strategies improves decision-making considerably.

 
AdviserRobert J. DeRubeis
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SourceDAI/B 70-01, p. , Apr 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClinical psychology; Cognitive psychology
Publication Number3346155
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3346155
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.