This dissertation topic is in the business ethics arena of whistleblowing. Whistleblowing is an act that attempts to point out unlawful activities of an employer or organization. When employees see an unlawful act, or are asked to perform an unlawful act, they have a social, moral, or legal responsibility to report the action to authorities or someone that can effect action. This qualitative phenomenological study concerns the lived experiences of 18 individuals when they decided to blow the whistle after witnessing unethical activities. It answers the exploratory research questions of what are the critical incidents that led these people to make the difficult decision to blow the whistle; the experiences they went through in making the decision; and, knowing the ramifications they suffered, would they blow the whistle again? This study reveals that the participants felt that morally, blowing the whistle was the right thing to do; to do nothing made them complicit; and, they would blow the whistle again. Their professional codes would not allow them to do otherwise.
|Adviser||Calvin A. Lathan III|
About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With nearly 4 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) Global database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.
PQDT Global combines content from a range of the world's premier universities - from the Ivy League to the Russell Group. Of the nearly 4 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 2.5 million in full text formats. Of those, over 1.7 million are available in PDF format. More than 90,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.