Statistical methods in surrogate marker research for clinical trials
by Li, Yun, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 2008, 168 pages; 3343135

Abstract:

A surrogate marker (S) is often an intermediate physical or laboratory indicator in a disease progression process. It can be measured earlier and cost less than the true endpoint (T). A surrogate marker may be able to facilitate early prediction of the treatment ( Z) effect on T and thus can be very useful in reducing the duration and cost of a clinical trial. In practice, it can either serve as a substitute for T or as an auxiliary variable. One part of my dissertation focuses on its role as an auxiliary variable. We aim to directly investigate its usage in predicting the treatment effect and identify the situations when S can be beneficial in improving the precision in both single- and multiple-trial settings when T is not completely observed. When the individual-level correlation is relatively high, there is substantial efficiency gain by using S, particularly in a multiple-trial setting. We also study the extent of efficiency gain with respect to different model assumptions that are used to describe the relationship among S, T and Z. The results motivate a generalized ridge regression method which strikes a balance between bias reduction and efficiency gain without the need to specify correct models. The other part of the dissertation directly models the relationship of T, S and Z in a causal framework. Previous work on surrogate markers often requires one to fit models for the distribution of T given S and Z. It is well known that it usually does not have a causal interpretation because the models condition on a post randomization variable S. To solve this problem, we adapt a causal framework using the principal stratification approach introduced by Frangakis and Rubin (2002). We propose a Bayesian method to estimate the causal associations between the potential outcomes of S and T. To not only overcome some non-identifiability problems but also improve the precision of the statistical inference, we incorporate assumptions that are plausible in the surrogate context into prior distributions. The method is explored in both single trial and multiple trial settings.

 
AdviserJeremy M. G. Taylor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
SourceDAI/B 70-01, p. , Mar 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBiostatistics
Publication Number3343135
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3343135
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.