Meeting kids at their own game: A comparison of learning and engagement in traditional and 3D MUVE educational -gaming contexts
by Arici, Anne Dickson, Ph.D., INDIANA UNIVERSITY, 2008, 185 pages; 3342204


This study compared a traditional classroom environment with that of a QA (Multi-user virtual environment) video game designed for education called Quest Atlantis (QA). Measures of learning and engagement were gathered within a 2-week water quality unit, taught in four 6th grade classrooms with the same teacher implementing curricula in 4 intact classes, randomly assigned to either delivery mode through a quasi-experimental design. Although both conditions shared equivalent content, the Traditional condition was text-based, and activities were teacher-led. The QA condition was virtual-based, and placed the teacher in the role of resource, while students uncovered information within the larger structure of QA's virtual world.

Pretests showed no significant differences between instructional conditions. Posttest data indicated that both groups had significant learning gains, though the gain for the QA group was significantly higher than the traditional group. A delayed posttest showed the QA group retained significantly more information from the unit than the traditional instruction group.

Results also indicated the QA group also scored significantly higher in their ratings of engagement in the curricula than the traditional delivery mode. Further evidence of engagement was demonstrated by free choice activities, where approximately 75% of the QA students chose to complete optional activities for no credit, while in the Traditional group only 4% did a similar optional assignment despite the benefit of 'extra credit'. Further analyses of the levels of participation, engagement, and immersion in the two delivery modes are offered through qualitative analyses.

AdviserJoyce Alexander
SourceDAI/A 70-02, Apr 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Cognitive psychology
Publication Number3342204
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.