Motivation, academic success, and learning environments: Comparing high school face-to-face and online courses
by Daniels, Barbara M., Ph.D., GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, 2009, 134 pages; 3340542

Abstract:

The purpose of the study was to investigate and compare the motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement of classroom based and online students to describe differences and interpret the role of motivation and learning strategy use in online learning. Fifty one participants were included from two educational settings: thirty-one were from a traditional, classroom based setting, twenty were from an online course. All students were enrolled in one of three math courses: Algebra 1, Algebra 2, or Geometry.

Eight scales from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire were administered to students in both environments to assess motivation and learning strategy use. Other data collected were achievement scores: class grade and SOL test scores. Correlation analysis and regression analysis of sample responses confirmed the role of motivation in academic achievement and that the sample results showed patterns similar to that of the larger population. The investigation proceeded with a comparison of the two groups within the sample.

T-tests were conducted to compare the groups; results indicated that online students reported significantly higher self efficacy and time management skills and that these constructs contributed to a significant difference in class grade. Further, these constructs may be useful to identify students who may need support to successfully complete an online class. The results are informative for educators who teach or design online classes and those who advise students considering online learning opportunities.

 
AdviserPriscilla Norton
SchoolGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-12, p. , Mar 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSecondary education; Educational technology; Curriculum development
Publication Number3340542
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3340542
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.