The effects of education on health care professionals' assessment of intimate partner violence in primary care settings
by Sheffield, Sherry G., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON, 2008, 139 pages; 3339162

Abstract:

This study was designed to explore what factors influence healthcare professionals’ intimate partner violence (IPV) assessment and to examine the effects of education on healthcare professionals’ IPV knowledge, opinions, and assessment behaviors. A quasi-experimental, pretest-post-test non-equivalent comparison group design was utilized to collect data. One hundred forty-nine (N = 149) healthcare professionals from three outpatient healthcare settings participated in this study. Participants completed a survey questionnaire (PREMIS) designed to measure healthcare professionals’ IPV knowledge, attitudes, and practices and to assess training effectiveness. Participants’ responses on PREMIS scales were evaluated to determine the relationship between sample demographics, previous training, preparation, knowledge, and opinions with IPV assessment in practice. Responses on IPV knowledge scales, opinion subscales, and practice scales were evaluated to assess the effectiveness of the education intervention.

Study findings revealed that 32% of the study sample had no previous IPV training and 60% of those who had training of some kind reported two or less hours. Knowledge scores were significantly lower than a normed data set at pretest for the experimental group, however, post-test knowledge scores improved significantly (p = .00) following participation in the education intervention and effect size analysis revealed that 41% of the variability in knowledge scores was explained by membership in the experimental group. The experimental group’s knowledge and opinion scores were also significantly improved when compared to the comparison/control groups. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was utilized to explore what factors influence assessment behaviors in practice. Findings suggest that self-efficacy was the strongest predictor of variability in practice issues for participants in this study.

 
AdviserEmily Spence-Almaguer
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON
SourceDAI/A 69-12, p. , Mar 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial work; Adult education
Publication Number3339162
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3339162
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.