What temples stood for: Constantine, Eusebius, and Roman imperial practice
by Larson, Steven J., Ph.D., BROWN UNIVERSITY, 2008, 238 pages; 3335669

Abstract:

This dissertation is an examination of the Emperor Constantine's religious building program as presented in the writings of Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea. I seek to redescribe the range of Constantine's construction and destruction activities in a way that addresses some limitations in previous scholarship. Historians since Eusebius have struggled to apply a consistent explanatory framework to his seemingly contradictory religious policies and beliefs. Much of the emperor's own writing suggests that he was a sincere Christian, and yet he allowed the repair and construction of several "Pagan" temples in Rome and prominently displayed "Pagan" bronze statuary in his new eponymous capital. According to Eusebius, he also ordered the destruction of five temples in the eastern half of the empire, and confiscated the property of Donatist churches in North Africa. In addition, he had large and lavish basilicas built to honor the Christian god in cities and towns across his territory.

In this study, I argue that, in order to move beyond the legacy of Eusebius' theological representation of Constantine, modern scholars have downplayed the interrelationship of ancient imperial politics and religion. My approach is to first differentiate between the discursive categories used by the bishop and the emperor to represent this activity as it is preserved in Eusebius' Life of Constantine and Tricennial Orations, and note how their rhetorics reflect their particular social positions. Next, in order to complicate Eusebius' Christian exclusivist explanatory framework, I attempt to situate Constantine within the larger context of the Roman imperial practice of his predecessors. Then, I examine in detail the emperor's building activities in Rome, Palestine, and Constantinople, and argue that they can best be understood as the actions of an imperial victor building in honor of his patron deity. I employ poststructuralist theories of social positioning and Jonathan Z. Smith's conception of a "locative" approach to religion to argue that Constantine was building according to the traditional ancient Mediterranean religious logic in which different places and situations call for different practices.

 
Advisor
SchoolBROWN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-11, p. , Jan 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsReligious history; Ancient history
Publication Number3335669
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3335669
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.