Stress and anxiety reduction factors among law enforcement officers
by Kyle, Bradley Forrest, Ph.D., UNION INSTITUTE AND UNIVERSITY, 2008, 154 pages; 3333838

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of humorous video, especially humor that produces laughter, would prove effective and valuable in reducing the level and degree of anxiety among law enforcement officers. Prior studies have incorporated the use of humorous video to successfully reduce stress and anxiety levels among other populations. Seventy-nine officers from two law enforcement agencies participated in this study. The experimental participants were given a first-round of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Speilberger, Gorusch, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983) then shown a short laughter-producing humorous video, after which a second round of the measurement was administered. A 30-day follow-up STAI Self-Evaluation Questionnaire was also administered. Officers from the control participant group followed the same procedures, but were shown a non-laughter producing video travelogue of the same duration. Analysis was conducted and significant reductions between STAI state scores before and after viewing the videos were determined and found to be similar for both groups. Thirty-day follow-up STAI state scores increased, indicating the effects of the video wore off for the experimental group; however, there was no effect on state scores for the control group. Thirty-day follow-up scores revealed no effect on trait for the experimental group; however, testing of the control group revealed a decrease in trait scores. Results suggest the travelogue video shown to the control group may not have been truly neutral and may have evoked a sense of escape and rest thereby contributing to measured lower levels of state anxiety. Additionally, it is suggested demand characteristics may have influenced participants and impacted subsequent results.

 
AdviserLawrence J. Ryan
SchoolUNION INSTITUTE AND UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 69-10, p. , Dec 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClinical psychology; Occupational psychology; Criminology
Publication Number3333838
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3333838
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.