Resting metabolism and metabolic responses to solid and liquid meals in sedentary and exercising college-age males
by Ratcliff, Lance, Ph.D., AUBURN UNIVERSITY, 2008, 90 pages; 3333145

Abstract:

Differences in resting metabolic rate (RMR) were measured in a total of 29 sedentary and exercising college-age males, as were their metabolic responses (diet-induced thermogenesis, DIT) to solid and liquid meals. Subject classification was based on habitual exercise. A group of 9 males was classified as sedentary, 11 males were classified as endurance (aerobic) exercisers, and 9 males were classified as weight lifters (resistance exercise). Resting metabolism was measured soon after waking; DIT for each meal was measured immediately following meal consumption, and then every 30 minutes for 3 hours. RMR and DIT were measured via indirect calorimetry, height was determined via stadiometer, and all body composition measurements were done with bioelectrical impedance. No significant differences existed between groups for age, body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, fat-free mass (ffm), percent ffm, and hydration. Moreover, no significant differences existed in DIT based on meal form (Eta2 = 0.049, F = 1.336, p = 0.258). However, there was a significant overall metabolic increase based on group (Eta 2 = 0.271, F = 4.844, p = 0.016). Specifically, both exercise groups had a significantly (p < 0.05) greater RMR when compared to the sedentary group; this increased RMR indicated that the exercise groups expended more energy expended more energy at rest than did the sedentary group. There were no significant RMR differences between the exercising groups (p = 0.843). RMR and DIT were negatively correlated (r = -0.38; p = 0.023). The variables positively correlated with RMR include ffm (r = 0.59; p < 0.001), and BMI (r = 0.39; p = 0.020). In conclusion, these findings give further support to the importance of exercise, specifically frequent and intense exercise, in amplifying resting metabolic rate and increasing total energy expenditure.

 
AdviserKevin Huggins
SchoolAUBURN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 69-10, p. , Dec 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsNutrition; Physiology
Publication Number3333145
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3333145
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.