Increasing trustworthiness in Web-page searches by using an alternative approach for Web-page ranking
by Parrell, Daniel J., Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2008, 141 pages; 3330346

Abstract:

Current Web search-and-retrieval system algorithms produce a significant number of untrustworthy results that, in turn, cause inefficiencies for Web users, including increased time determining what information can be trusted and decreased accuracy of Web search results. The purpose of this design research study was to develop and examine the relative efficacy of a new approach to trustworthiness of Web-page ranking based on the number of categories and characteristics associated with a keyword. This design research study consisted of a conceptual model codified for the purpose of theory development of Web search and retrieval applying concepts in Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing. Two areas were investigated for impact on the trustworthiness of Web page results: first the placement of characters to search and frequency of the characteristics of the keyword being searched in a Web page, and second how well the new approach performed compared to the traditional PageRank™ Web-page ranking algorithm by manually assigning points to Web pages using a trustworthiness scale developed for this study, calculating results, and validating the results through a reverse look up of the Web page. A key finding from this study is that when Web pages are ranked by categories and characteristics of a keyword, marginal improvements are made in trustworthy Web-page results compared to PageRank™. A positive social impact resulting from this study is an improvement in the trustworthiness of Web search-andretrieval ranking results. A recommendation is that Web search-and-retrieval systems should include ranking through categories and characteristics of keywords to improve the trustworthiness of results.

 
AdviserRobert Kilmer
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-09, p. , Dec 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Information science; Computer science
Publication Number3330346
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3330346
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.