An investigation of faculty knowledge and perceptions toward college students with reading and writing difficulties
by Quick, Robin L., D.Ed., INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2008, 147 pages; 3329895

Abstract:

Academically vulnerable students are becoming a larger than expected component in college classrooms across the country (Perin, 2006; Spann, 2000). These students often show poor performance on class assignments and exams due to a lack of reading and writing skills at a level needed to succeed in a college classroom. Support centers and tutoring services are not equipped to handle the increased volume of academically vulnerable students nor the types of needs these students demand, causing the responsibility to shift more heavily to faculty.

This research focused on examining the knowledge and perceptions of college faculty as they relate to working with college students who struggle with reading and writing. The ultimate objective for this investigation is to ascertain college faculty's ability to recognize the characteristics of academically vulnerable students and to offer assistance that meets the needs of this unique population.

To assess the knowledge and perceptions that college faculty have toward working with academically vulnerable students, faculty from six colleges and universities in northwestern Pennsylvania responded to an electronic survey. Data from the survey were analyzed using frequency and Chi Square statistical analysis. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive analysis.

Findings of the study indicate that gaps exist between faculty perceptions of their role in working with academically vulnerable students and the implementation of the assistance needed by this student population. Recommendations focus on increasing and improving the professional development opportunities for faculty offered by higher education institutions.

 
AdviserGeorge R. Bieger
SchoolINDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SourceDAI/A 69-08, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCurriculum development; Higher education
Publication Number3329895
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3329895
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.