Co-evolution of product families and assembly systems
by Bryan, April M., Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 2008, 117 pages; 3328776

Abstract:

To remain competitive in the midst of global competition and rapidly changing consumer tastes, manufacturers increased the amount of product variety they offer to the market and their responsiveness to changing market needs. Product families and reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) enable manufacturers to cost effectively supply high product variety and to be responsive. However, there is a lack of systematic methods for the joint design of product families and RMSs.

Co-evolution of product families and assembly systems is introduced as a new method for the joint design and reconfiguration of product families and assembly systems within and across product generations. There are two main phases in the co-evolution methodology. The first phase involves the joint design of a product family and assembly system in the first generation. The second phase involves the joint evolution of the product family and assembly system between product generations.

For co-evolution, models are required for: (i) the joint design of a product family and its corresponding assembly system, (ii) the evolution of the product family within the constraints of an assisting assembly system, and (iii) the reconfiguration of the assembly system. Methodologies are introduced for the first and third problems in this dissertation.

Two non-linear integer programming (INLP) formulations are developed for the problem of the concurrent design of a single generation of a product family and assembly system. The objective of the first formulation is to maximize the efficiency of the assembly system and minimize the oversupply of functionality. The objective of the second formulation is to maximize profits. Genetic algorithms are introduced for the solution of these problems.

The assembly system reconfiguration planning (ASRP) problem is also formulated as INLP. Genetic algorithm and dynamic programming procedures are introduced for the solution of this problem. In addition, an algorithm for generating all the possible assembly system configurations is introduced.

Examples are used to demonstrate how the methods for co-evolution introduced in this dissertation can lead to reduced costs and increased responsiveness to market changes.

 
AdvisersShixin Jack Hu; Yoram Koren
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
SourceDAI/B 69-09, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsIndustrial engineering; Mechanical engineering
Publication Number3328776
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3328776
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.