Differential treatment effects due to post randomization psychological factors: A causal rank preserving modeling approach
by Faerber, Jennifer A., Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2008, 172 pages; 3328553

Abstract:

Introduction. There are questions on whether the effectiveness of Beck's cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on depression in suicidal patients depends on factors early in the CBT process.

Purpose. The causal mediation method of Ten Have et al. (2007) is extended with an interaction to identify early post randomization modifiers of the CBT effect on follow-up depression in suicide attempters.

Sample. 120 recent suicide attempters were randomized to either cognitive therapy or usual care to prevent future suicide attempts during 18 months of follow-up (Brown et al., 2005).

Method. 1- and 3-month hopelessness and social problem orientation measures were examined as effect modifiers of the CBT effect on 6-month depression with a Rank Preserving Model (RPM; Joffe et al., 1998; Ten Have et al., 2007) that included an interaction term between CBT and a post randomization factor. Comparisons were made with a standard interaction regression model, relying on the strong assumption of no unmeasured confounding of the post randomization moderator-outcome relation. The RPM approach does not make such an assumption but does rely on other potentially testable assumptions.

Results. The data analysis showed statistically significant effect modification under the RPM, whereas the standard regression model showed less significant effect modification. Simulation results showed unexpectedly good results for the standard regression model under unmeasured confounding. The RPM performed slightly better with respect to bias of the stratified CBT effect, but worse for the interaction effect. The RPM expectedly showed greater variability than the standard regression model in terms of the mean square error.

Discussion. Both the RPM and standard regression methods performed well in simulations, whereas there was some disagreement between the methods for the data analysis. The RPM can be used as a check for unmeasured confounding when using the standard regression model.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SourceDAI/B 69-09, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBiostatistics; Quantitative psychology and psychometrics; Cognitive psychology
Publication Number3328553
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3328553
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.