The effectiveness of computer supported collaborative learning on helping tasks in a mathematics course
by Chen, Chiayi, Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, 2008, 246 pages; 3325233

Abstract:

Researchers (Lou, 2004; Lou, Abrami, & d'Apollonia, 2001; Susman, 1998) have conducted meta-analyses to compare collaborative and individual learning when working with computers. Their consistent findings show that students working in groups outperform students working with computers individually. However, Webb, Ing, Kersting and Nemer (2006) indicate that learning benefits are promoted in the group only when students are able to seek and give elaborated help effectively.

This study examined the effectiveness of computer supported collaborative learning on mathematic problem solving in a blended distance learning course. In this study, the instruction consisted of lectures and face-to-face collaboration, and online homework. The purpose of the study was to determine whether helping strategies instruction used in a designed collaborative learning structure would increase academic achievement in the blended distance learning course compared to the individual help group.

This study utilized 2x2 ANOVA with a repeated measures design. The first factor was group (collaborative help group versus individual help group), and the second factor was occasion (pre-test-post-test). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups—the collaborative help group (n=42) and the individual help group (n=21).

It was hypothesized that the collaborative help group would perform better in content understanding, domain-specific problem solving strategies, domain-independent problem solving strategies (elaboration, adaptive help-seeking strategies and maladaptive help-seeking strategies), and self-regulation (test anxiety, effort, academic efficacy, and control strategies) than would the individual help group. In addition, it was hypothesized that the participants in the collaborative help group would have better teamwork skills (cognitive teamwork scale and interpersonal teamwork scale).

The results showed that the collaborative help group significantly outperformed the individual help group on content understanding. And the collaborative help group requested more helps and asked more questions than did the individual help group. However, the participants in the collaborative help group did not perform any better than those in the individual help group on teamwork skills, problem strategies, and self regulation strategies posttests. This study provided evidence for integrating a problem solving model with collaborative learning components. Educators can use helping strategies training as an instructional strategy to enhance their current collaborative learning design.

 
AdviserHarold O'Neil
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SourceDAI/A 69-09, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMathematics education; Educational technology; Higher education
Publication Number3325233
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3325233
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.