A comparison between teacher and principal perceptions on the characteristics of effective instructional leaders within the context of professional development
by Cornell, Thomas G., Ed.D., SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, 2008, 120 pages; 3324156

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to compare teacher and principal perceptions on the characteristics of effective instructional leaders within the context of professional development. A survey was constructed based on the National Staff Development Council leadership strand within the context standards for staff development. The survey was mailed to principals within the suburban area of a large, midwestern city. Principals were asked to distribute the survey to teachers in their respective schools. A total of 169 surveys were returned. The total return rate was 30% with a return rate of 34% for principals and 29% for teachers. The intervening variables of gender, education level, district size, and level of experience were also examined. A series of independent two-sample t-tests was carried out to compare principals to teachers on all eight questions from the survey. A series of one-way analysis of variance was used to examine how various intervening variables affected perceptions of teachers and principals. Questions four and five showed a significant difference between teacher and principal perceptions on the characteristics of effective instructional leaders. Null hypothesis four was rejected at the p<.01 level. This question focused on involving the faculty in the planning and implementation of staff development. Null hypothesis five was rejected at the p<.05 level. This question focused on the administrator modeling continuous improvement by stating publicly personal professional learning goals and asking for feedback from the faculty.

 
AdviserLavern Scott
SchoolSAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-07, p. , May 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration; Curriculum development
Publication Number3324156
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3324156
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.