The relationship between legislative implementations and educator readiness in inclusive educational environments
by Smith, Gina Scoggins, D.M., UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, 2008, 198 pages; 3322892

Abstract:

Gaps exist between the legislative mandates and what educators are able to deliver in the U.S. school system. The purpose of the study was to identify strategies that might be incorporated in inclusive educational environments to better train and equip professionals who work in inclusive situations. The data examined included perceptions of educators regarding training, resources, and legislation related to inclusive educational environments. Research has shown minimal resources and training related to inclusion. Twenty educators were interviewed to determine their experiences and their needs to successfully function in inclusive situations. Findings indicated that educators desired training in team building and communication strategies. Other areas of training needs included professional development sessions that educated teachers and staff about the traits of students with special needs, strategies used to work with students in inclusive settings, and definitions related to how inclusive environments operate. The study revealed the need for collaboration time among general educators, special educators, and administration. Educators also mentioned that observations in educational environments that have successfully implemented inclusive classrooms would be beneficial. The majority of educators also stated that positive relationships among administration, general educators, and special educators would promote a collaborative atmosphere when working in inclusive educational environments. Recommendations related to the findings supported the need to further investigate the relationship between legislation, implementations related to legislation, and effective practices associated with inclusion.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX
SourceDAI/A 69-08, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration; Elementary education; Special education
Publication Number3322892
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/3322892.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.