Obstetricians' reactions to the threat of medical malpractice litigation
by Papadopoulos, Daphne Athena, Psy.D., MASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 117 pages; 3322263

Abstract:

The reasons medical malpractice is such a salient issue for physicians are poorly understood. In the 2006 ACOG Survey on Professional Liability 89.2% of respondents indicated they had one or more claims filed against them during their careers, with an average of 2.62 claims per physician. The literature and policy positions on professional liability tend to focus on monetary issues and litigation prevention, however data suggest that affective issues may be a central concern for physicians.

The objective of this study was to investigate obstetrician-gynecologists' affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses to the threat or reality of malpractice claims and litigation. These responses were explored through 15 in-depth semi-structured interviews with generalist obstetrician-gynecologists. Each participant also completed a questionnaire about demographics and claim history. A thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis.

Eleven of the fifteen (73.3%) physicians interviewed reported being named in one or more claims during their careers. Nearly all sued physicians experience emotional distress. For 80% of the participants the emotional threat of being sued was their top or one of their top concerns related to malpractice. Better support systems are needed to help physicians manage the stress of malpractice claims and litigation. A support group intervention that combines the support of colleagues with the expertise of a mental health professional would be ideal.

There is a disconnect between the focus of professional societies and the concerns of physicians. The financial reforms targeted by professional societies are unlikely to ease the emotional burden of malpractice on physicians. Other legislative and policy initiatives are needed to address these inherently psychological problems.

 
Advisor
SchoolMASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
SourceDAI/B 69-07, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsObstetrics and gynecology; Medicine; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3322263
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3322263
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.