Impact of a faculty learning institute on the productive grade rates and student retention rates for mathematics students in a South Texas community college
by Krueger, Conrad D., Sr., Ed.D., TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - CORPUS CHRISTI, 2008, 85 pages; 3322112

Abstract:

This study examined the effectiveness of the Murguia Learning Institute's (the Institute) faculty development initiative which took place in Spring 2006 designed to improve mathematics teaching skills at a community college. The goal of enhancing teaching is to increase student success; therefore, the study focused on productive grade and retention rates in developmental mathematics and college algebra courses at a community college. Central to the investigation was to evaluate whether the Institute effectively improved mathematics teaching that could be measured by student outcomes. The researcher employed an ex post facto study to examine the impact of the Institute on these rates. He collected productive grade and retention rates from the developmental mathematics and college algebra courses of the 49 tenure/tenure track mathematics instructors' who taught at the college during the Fall of 2005 and Fall 2006. Out of the 49 instructors, 22 attended the Institute. From a series of two by two repeated measures analysis of variance, the data showed no statically significant difference between those who participated in the Institute and those who did not on the basis of over-time changes. However, the Time effect on developmental mathematics productive grade rates and developmental mathematics retention rates were statistically significant and showed that for both groups, the indices increased from pretest to posttest.

In order to clarify and embellish the quantitative study, six randomly selected participants in the MLI were interviewed using a Critical Incident Survey technique. The interviews confirmed four of the best practice themes identified in the literature on faculty development. These were the need (1) to understand students, (2) for pedagogical knowledge (3) to identify participant learning needs, and (4) for additional faculty development initiatives.

 
AdviserCaroline Sherritt
SchoolTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - CORPUS CHRISTI
SourceDAI/A 69-06, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunity college education; Mathematics education; Educational administration; Teacher education; Higher education
Publication Number3322112
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3322112
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.