Captacion, internalizacion y uso del preterito y del imperfecto en hablantes casi nativos de espanol
by Rodriguez, Susana Ivonne, Ph.D., STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO, 2008, 231 pages; 3320430

Abstract:

This study deals with the preterite/imperfect distinction in Spanish from a less commonly analyzed perspective: reception, building of mental representations, and usage of the preterite and the imperfect by near-native speakers of Spanish whose native language is English. Experimental evidence from one main task and two auxiliary tasks involving translation and spontaneous oral expressions suggests that there are many similarities among the performances of near-native speakers (the 'experimental' group), although this performance is not always similar to that of native speakers (the 'control' group). It is hypothesized that the usage of knowledge (performance) and the knowledge itself (competence) are strongly associated in the preterite/imperfect complex semantic contrast and that in the minds/brains of near-native speakers there are two different sources for obtaining and developing this linguistic knowledge: one implicit, spontaneous, and unconscious (acquisition) and the other explicit, conscious, and formal-teaching-focused (learning). Therefore, we conclude that near-native speakers of Spanish do build a group of consistent and unconscious mental representations similar to those of native speakers of Spanish and, when they do so, they then have access to some modules of the Universal Grammar (UG) that allow them to develop a sense of grammaticality which, in many cases, is similar to the native one. All this is achieved despite misleading, inadequate, and incomplete textbook explanations, deficient and partial oral expressions and the lack of the imperfective/perfective distinction (grammatical aspect) in English as native language.

 
AdvisersJorge M. Guitart; Eva Juarros-Daussa
SchoolSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO
SourceDAI/A 69-08, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBilingual education; Linguistics; Modern language
Publication Number3320430
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3320430
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.