A correlation study of scheduling and achievement in Illinois high schools
by Ryker, Terry Ray, Ph.D., SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE, 2008, 139 pages; 3320331

Abstract:

The study had two main purposes. The first purpose was to determine whether there was any difference in the academic achievement of students receiving their education through a traditional, an alternating eight-block, or four-by-four block scheduled high school in the state of Illinois, as measured by the Prairie State Achievement Exam (PSAE). The second purpose was to determine whether there was any difference in the graduation rates of traditional, an alternating eight-block, or four-by-four block scheduled high schools in the State of Illinois. For the two purposes, socioeconomic status (SES) and type of community were included in the analysis. A questionnaire was sent to every principal from public high schools in the state of Illinois. Of the 637 surveys sent out, 73.3% were returned. ANOVAs were used to compare average PSAE scores in mathematics, reading and science as well as graduation rates. Levels of significance were determined at an alpha level of .05. Tukey/Krammer post hoc tests were used to determine which schedule type(s) were significantly better if the ANOVA showed a significant difference.

While differences were found in average PSAE scores and graduation rates, most of the differences were not significant. Of the 96 possible comparisons, significant differences were found in only 10 occasions. Seven of the significant differences were found in mathematics, two in science, and one in reading. There were no instances of significant difference in graduation rates. The significant differences were found mainly at schools with a high SES, from the suburbs or a combination of the two and from schools with a low SES, from urban cities or a combination of the two.

 
AdviserPatrick Dilley
SchoolSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE
SourceDAI/A 69-08, p. , Nov 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration
Publication Number3320331
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3320331
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.