Depressive symptoms, perceived stigma, and perceived social support in fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis patients
by Harakas, Peter, Ph.D., ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 96 pages; 3319481

Abstract:

Perceived stigma has been shown to be related to poorer quality of life, higher levels of depression, and lower social support availability in various types of chronic illness. In the area of chronic pain specifically, there is growing evidence that patients suffering from functional somatic syndromes report relatively high levels of perceived stigma and depressive symptoms compared to patients with well-established medical diagnoses. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of diagnosis, perceived stigma, and perceived social support on depressive symptoms in a sample of chronic pain patients. A sample of 112 female fibromyalgia (FM) and osteoarthritis (OA) patients was assessed longitudinally with a 1.5-year interval between initial and follow-up assessment. The results show that FM patients reported higher levels of depression and perceived stigma, and lower levels of perceived social support compared to OA patients. Hierarchical regression analyses provided support that perceived stigma contributes significantly to the prediction of depression over and above the effects of pain and other control variables. Diagnosis was found to moderate the relationship between stigma and depression so that FM compared to OA patients had greater increases in depressive symptoms with increased levels of perceived stigma. Mediational analyses showed that perceived social support mediates the relationship between the interaction of stigma by diagnosis, and depressive symptoms. Longitudinal analyses failed to show that perceived stigma predicts future levels of depression over and above initial depression levels. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

 
Advisor
SchoolARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 69-07, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial psychology; Clinical psychology; Sociology
Publication Number3319481
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3319481
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.