An analysis of faculty perspectives on the theory and practice of academic freedom
by West, Robin R., Ph.D., INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 125 pages; 3318966

Abstract:

Academic freedom is a concept said to be poorly defined and misunderstood. Much of the literature on academic freedom suggests that the presumed professorial right is threatened by a variety of internal and external forces. This study examines the theory and practice of academic freedom within the context of instruction in the university classroom.

The study attempts to determine if there is a difference between faculty perspectives about the theoretical constructs of academic freedom and its praxis in instructional practice. In other words, "this is what I believe academic freedom is and does, but here is what I have experienced."

This study involved tenured or tenure-track teaching faculty from four American Association of State Colleges and Universities institutions located in the Great Lakes region of the upper Mid-West. The sample consisted of 123 faculty with terminal degrees, teaching in one of the following departments: Biology/Life Sciences; English; History; Philosophy; Political Science; and Sociology. The Questionnaire of Faculty Perceptions about the Theory and Practice of Academic Freedom asked faculty to indicate their understanding of the theoretical constructs of academic freedom and their application when choosing course materials, topics of discussion, instructional methodologies, and student assignments. The questionnaire utilized Likert scale items (a range of 1-5), as well as open-ended items.

This result of this study was surprising in that it appeared to contradict the literature on academic freedom. The findings suggested that there was no significant difference between faculty perspectives about academic freedom theory and practice in the university classroom.

 
AdviserSusan Kiger
SchoolINDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-06, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsTeacher education; Curriculum development; Higher education
Publication Number3318966
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3318966
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.