The effects of high-stakes testing on teacher accountability
by Knight, Catrina R., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2008, 138 pages; 3316096

Abstract:

Educators' views on teacher accountability vary greatly. As the impact of high-stakes testing permeates all public school systems, systems continually implement more and more accountability measures for teachers. Educators expect students to make and demonstrate progress as measured by annual or biennial assessments. Many parents blame the schools and, more specifically, classroom teachers, when their children's performance on these tests does not meet or exceed the level of proficiency. Schools are categorized as making adequate yearly progress (AYP) or not making AYP. Schools that make AYP are applauded; schools that do not make AYP are given ultimatums after adequate progress is not made over a period of three years. On the elementary, middle, and secondary school level, scores are sometimes attributed to specific teachers, depending on the grade level or course that the educator teaches. This research study, which employs the use of both quantitative and qualitative methods, examines the use of high-stakes testing for teacher accountability. Additionally, the study will address accountability measures used to evaluate schools and students because student performance and accountability directly affect both school accountability and teacher accountability. Furthermore, this study will examine the results of studies by educators who are credible in the field of educational research and assessment. Surveys and interviews will be conducted to ascertain subjective and objective responses to several questions directed to professional colleagues and parents of elementary, middle, and high school students.

 
AdviserTracey Lacey
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-07, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational tests & measurements; Educational administration; Teacher education
Publication Number3316096
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3316096
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.