A comparison of the effects of online synchronous versus online asynchronous versus traditional approaches on learner achievement via education of Mississippi child care providers
by Stanford, Carla Caldwell, Ph.D., MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 169 pages; 3315184

Abstract:

The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to compare three types of instruction: online synchronous, online asynchronous, and traditional, and assess which would yield more learner achievement. Participants for the online groups volunteered then were randomly assigned to either the online synchronous or the online asynchronous. Participants for the traditional group were also voluntary but were not randomly assigned; all that volunteered for the traditional group were accepted.

In the final sample, a total of 96 Mississippi child care professionals completed the course Early Learning Guidelines: Lesson Plans and Thematic Units for Three Year Old Children: 31 in the online synchronous group, 32 in the online asynchronous group, and 33 in the traditional group. The dependent variable was learner achievement and the independent variable was type of instruction. The design of the study was pretest-posttest control group.

Two hypotheses guided the study: (1) Participants in the synchronous online class will exhibit higher achievement than participants in the asynchronous class and (2) Participants in the asynchronous or the synchronous online class would exhibit achievement equal to or higher than the traditional group.

Synchronous participants provided with instruction did perform higher than did the traditional participants. The synchronous and asynchronous groups were not statistically different, nor were the asynchronous and the traditional group.

 
AdviserMichael E. Newman
SchoolMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-07, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEarly childhood education; Curriculum development
Publication Number3315184
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3315184
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.