It is the principal of the thing: Georgia's school principals' understanding of the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) standards and the relevance of the ISLLC standards in 21st century principal preparation programs
by George, Harold W. (Bill), Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2008, 148 pages; 3311394

Abstract:

Ever since the origin of public education, stakeholders have scrutinized the institution of education and its leaders in some form or fashion. This holds true today. With the publication of A Nation at Risk in 1983, the prominent standards based education movement was ushered in. This resulted in standards for students, teachers, and principals. The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards, published by the Council of Chief State School Officials (CCSSO) in 1996, provided a template that many state departments of education and local school districts, along with colleges and universities, used to develop principal preparation programs and to develop evaluation tools for school leaders. In addition, these standards have been utilized to evaluate the work of many educational leaders. The state of Georgia utilized the ISLLC Standards in the development of 21st century principal preparation programs. The purpose of this research was to ascertain how relevant the ISLLC Standards were and to what extent the standards were utilized in developing educational leaders in Georgia. This research replicated the study conducted by Dr. J. Michel Morrow in 2003 in which his purpose was to ascertain the relevancy of the ISLLC Standards and to the extent to which the standards were utilized in developing educational leaders in his home state of Illinois. This research was designed to provide opportunities for continued research of the ISLLC Standards and the relevancy of the standards in principal preparation programs throughout the country.

 
AdviserTracey Lacey
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-06, p. , Oct 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration
Publication Number3311394
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3311394
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.