The power of touch during communication within heterosexual married dyads
by Seeman Smith, Joann C., Ph.D., IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 74 pages; 3311312

Abstract:

The literature on sex differences in nonverbal behavior is mixed. Some studies find differences in intimate relationships whereas others do not. One reason may be that no study has examined different measurements of touch in intimate couples and examined sex differences based on who chose the topic. The present study was designed to fill this gap in the research in regards to the assessment of touching behavior within married dyads and their possible expression of power moves by measuring seven different measurement of touch (i.e., overall touches, power touches, supportive touches, hand touches, non-hand touches, touches while talking, touches while listening) across a problematic topic chosen by the wife and a topic chosen by the husband. In partial support of the hypotheses, the results of mixed-model ANOVAs showed that women engage touches while talking than men during their own discussion while no differences were found on the man's discussion. A trend for significance was found for women engaging in more overall touch and power touches then men on the females' discussion then on the males' discussion. For touches more thought of as support (supportive touches and touches while listening) females engaged in significantly more of these types of touches than males regardless of whose discussion. Contrary to predictions, hand touches were found to have no differences based on who choose the topic, although women were found to engage in more overall hand touches than males. Also contrary to predictions, women engaged in more non-hand touches; however, they were doing so only during their own conversation. Implications of these results and suggests for future research on nonverbal behaviors associated with power are discussed.

 
AdviserDavid L. Vogel
SchoolIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 69-06, p. , Sep 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBehavioral sciences; Communication; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3311312
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3311312
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.