Collaborative corporate social responsibility: A case study examination of the international public relations agency involvement in the United Nations Global Compact
by Byrd, Leslie Simone, Ph.D., HOWARD UNIVERSITY, 2008, 204 pages; 3307026

Abstract:

Seeking to understand the relationship between public relations practice and corporate social responsibility initiatives, this research examined how two American-based international public relations agencies—Ketchum, Inc., and Ruder Finn, Inc.—came to take part in the United Nations (U.N.) Global Compact. The Global Compact is a social responsibility initiative that brings together more than 4,000 participants from multiple sectors in over 100 countries to address social issues. Using the three independent variables of Grunig's situational theory of publics, this qualitative study sought to identify: (a) the events that prompted these senior-level executives as members, as members of their agency's dominant coalition, to initiate participation in the Global Compact, (b) what obstacles within the agency presented challenges to joining the Global Compact, and (c) how each agency integrated the Compact Principles into its work.

A single, embedded case study was developed and integrated three subunits of analysis: in-depth interviews, and primary and secondary document analysis. In-depth interviews were conducted with two, senior-level executives from each agency. Primary document analysis focused on the Communication on Progress (COP) reports, and secondary document analysis consisted of agency-produced materials, such as speeches and presentations as well as articles written for business publications. Document analysis was included to assess how these agencies had pursued integration of the 10 Compact Principles into their work. Overall results indicated that both agencies primarily used the Compact Principles as a tool to educate clients, but had yet to fully integrate the Compact Principles into their work, particularly their own internal operations.

 
AdviserRichard L. Wright
SchoolHOWARD UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-04, p. , Jul 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMarketing; Journalism; International law; Mass communication
Publication Number3307026
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3307026
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.