UMI  
ProQuest® Dissertations & Theses
The world's most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses. Learn more...
ProQuest  
 
 
Matthew's vision: The unity of the formula citations in Matt 1:1--4:16
by Holmes, Jeremy R., PhD, MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 0 pages; 3298495
 

Abstract: With few exceptions, past research on Matthew's use of Scripture has portrayed his citations of and allusions to Scripture as ad hoc and insensitive to context. In part, this is because traditional historical-critical methods tend of themselves to emphasize the disunity in a text. The present work builds on the discoveries of historical criticism, but also incorporates a narrative-critical approach to Matthew's textual “network,” i.e., the way one citation of or allusion to Scripture connects with others through key-words and shared themes to form a united body of mutually interpreting texts. An examination of texts cited in Matthew's formula citations in 1:1-4:16 reveals that they are all taken from contexts that describe the future restoration of Israel in imagery borrowed from the exodus out of Egypt. Given the scarcity of biblical texts that fit this description, one must conclude that Matthew has a strong interest in the new exodus theme. Besides this common theme, Matthew's citations are also connected by contextual proximity, key-words, and more particular shared themes. The new exodus theme of the formula citations fits into Matthew's sustained use of exodus typology in his infancy narrative. As Jesus typologically relives the bondage of Israel in Egypt and the subsequent exodus, he simultaneously relives the exile of Israel and foreshadows the restoration in himself. This reliving of Israel's history functions within Matthew's Gospel as a prologue that interprets Jesus' subsequent ministry, passion, and resurrection in light of Israel's Scriptures.

 
Advisor: Dempsey, Deirdre
School: MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY
Source: DAI-A 69/01, p. 247, Jul 2008
Source Type: PhD
Subjects: Bible
Publication Number: 3298495
     
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3298495
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

 
 
 

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.il.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.



Copyright © 2007 ProQuest. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

ProQuest