A comparison of academic achievement and retention of community college students in college algebra after completion of traditional or technology-based instruction
by Seal, Jennifer Ferrill, Ph.D., MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 92 pages; 3297775

Abstract:

This study was designed to compare the success rates in College Algebra between two groups of students attending a Mississippi community college. Eighty students enrolled in a College Algebra course were taught using traditional instructional techniques, and 70 students received technology-enhanced instruction. This study considered the effects of grade scores on a mathematics-achievement pretest and posttest, student attitudes toward mathematics, time-on-task while using technology during mathematics study, mathematics subscores on the American College Test, and withdrawal rates.

Data collected for this study were derived from the official transcripts of students enrolled in spring 2007 College Algebra classes of a Mississippi community college serving as the study site. A total of 150 students participated in the study. Statistical analysis included t tests, chi-square tests, Pearson product-moment correlations, and analysis of covariance to examine relationships between the two groups of students. The results indicate that the students who received College Algebra instruction via technology-based methods learned equally as well as the students who received the same instruction via traditional methods. The findings also indicate that the students who participated in the traditional College Algebra course had improved attitudes toward mathematics upon completion of the semester. With regard to those who participated in the technology-based College Algebra course, the amount of time devoted to technology use during mathematics study did not correlate to their final grades (i.e., grades were not higher as this expenditure of time increased).

 
AdviserJames E. Davis
SchoolMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-02, p. , Jun 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunity college education; Mathematics education; Educational technology
Publication Number3297775
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3297775
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.