Governors and the National Governors Association (NGA): Examining the federal lobbying impact of the NGA
by Herian, Mitchel N., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN, 2008, 242 pages; 3297756

Abstract:

The office of the governor in the United States has received increased attention from political scientists in recent years. The main focus of this scholarly activity has mainly centered on the rising prominence and importance of the governor in leading state governments and guiding state policy. As a result of this focus, the role of the governors as policy entrepreneurs in the federal system has been relatively understudied, leaving political scientists unable to fully understand the office of the governor at a time when governors and the states have been seen as resurgent.

This dissertation examines the role of governors in the federal policy arena. Specifically, the governors' efforts at lobbying the federal government for state-friendly policies by working collectively through the National Governors Association are studied. It is hypothesized that the governors are influential at shaping policy in Congress. To test this hypothesis, both qualitative and quantitative methods are used. Two case studies are conducted; the Global Tobacco Settlement of 1998 was considered a success for the NGA, and the Internet Tax Freedom Act of 1998 was considered a non-success. Statistical analyses are also used to test the hypothesis. The findings generally support the hypothesis, though there appear to be various factors involving the internal operations of the NGA and the characteristics of Congress that impact the probability of NGA success in lobbying Congress.

The results of the analysis hold important implications for the study of the governorship in the U.S. First, the findings provide a way in which scholars can understand how governors use informal powers to shape policy outside their home states. Second, this research provides insight into the operations and success of intergovernmental lobbying groups such as the NGA. Finally, because of evidence that suggests that a collaborative form of federalism currently exists, dominant theories of federalism may need to be modified so that a more realistic conceptualization of the state-federal relationship can be developed.

 
AdviserKevin B. Smith
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN
SourceDAI/A 69-02, p. , Aug 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPolitical Science
Publication Number3297756
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3297756
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.