Curriculum orientations of alternative education teachers
by Crummey, Mark A., Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, 2007, 93 pages; 3297623

Abstract:

Public alternative program models have been in existence for several years, but effectiveness of these programs and the role they play in the meeting the goals of education are difficult to clearly understand. Types of alternative programs have been identified in the literature and include academic, behavioral, and therapeutic programs (Raywid, 1998). Perceptions of alternative education programs have been studied as well, but primarily include student, parent and administrator perceptions of program desirability related to purpose. These various perceptions have contributed to confusing the goals and practices of alternative education programs.

The beliefs that have not been studied are those of teachers working within alternative education programs. As teacher beliefs are related to their practice to some degree (Pajares, 1992), understanding those beliefs in alternative education teachers especially around concepts of curriculum was the purpose of this study. Using the modified-Curriculum Orientations Inventory (Rice & Mahlios, 2003), 95 teachers in Virginia alternative education programs responded to questions about their curriculum beliefs. Among demographic features, differences were discovered in gender, number of years teaching in alternative education and teacher pathway into alternative education, all of those related to behavioral beliefs about curriculum. No discernable differences existed among types of alternative programs. Differences between regular education teachers and alternative education teachers existed. Alternative education teachers viewed more strongly beliefs about curriculum that emphasized social reconstruction and practical beliefs about curriculum. Regular education teachers scored higher on a cognitive process approach to curriculum. Implications for further research and practice were also discussed.

 
AdviserMarc Mahlios
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
SourceDAI/A 69-02, p. , Jun 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration; Curriculum development
Publication Number3297623
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3297623
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.