Statistics students reasoning when comparing distributions of data
by Ciancetta, Matthew Alan, Ph.D., PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 423 pages; 3294660

Abstract:

This research was a qualitative study designed to investigate university students' reasoning strategies as they were engaged in making informal statistical inferences about pairs of data sets. The 275 university students who volunteered, were enrolled in at least one statistics course, and completed a task-based web survey where they reasoned about data set comparisons. Six, in-depth, follow up interviews were analyzed to support and initially validate the findings from the surveys. A major component of the research was focused on building and then refining an interpretive framework for reasoning about distributions of data. The framework was organized in a five-tiered lattice structure: Level 0 (Idiosyncratic); Level 1 (Local); Level 2 (Transitional); Level 3 (Initial Distributional); and Level 4 (Distributional).

Students enrolled in their first undergraduate level general statistics course tended to respond to the tasks at lower framework levels and compare the data sets from a local perspective. Students enrolled in graduate level statistics courses tended to respond to the tasks at higher framework levels and compare the data sets from a global perspective. Students enrolled in either an undergraduate level statistics course for engineering majors or enrolled in their second undergraduate level general statistics course tended to respond to the tasks at the middle framework levels and compare the data sets from a perspective that was in transition, from local to global. Students who tended to compare data from either a local or transitional perspective also had difficulty in understanding statistical measures, such as mean and standard deviation, as group representatives.

Across all the groups there was a clear separation between students who could reason proportionally and those who could not, and that separation was correlated with students who appeared to view data from a global perspective and those who did not. Thus proportional reasoning is one of the keys to gaining a global perspective of data. This implies that statistics courses, particularly introductory courses, need to give explicit attention to developing proportional reasoning in the context of describing and comparing data, in order to promote students' understanding of distributions of data from a global perspective.

 
Advisor
SchoolPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 68-12, p. , Mar 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMathematics education; Higher education
Publication Number3294660
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3294660
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.