The relationship between team cohesion and performance of Division I track and field athletes
by Patchell, James S., Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, 2007, 94 pages; 3292652

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine the direction and magnitude of the relationship between cohesion as measured by the GEQ, team performance, and individual performance in the co-acting sport of collegiate track and field. The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) was used to measure both social and task cohesion. Team Performance was measured by a team's total points scored at the conference outdoor competition. Individual performance was measured using the IAAF Scoring Tables for Athletics.

The participants in this study were members from women's NCAA Division I track and field programs in a conference located in the southeast United States. There were three data collection periods. Four teams participated in the cohesion/team performance portion of the study. Participants within these four teams numbered 66. There were 30 participants in the cohesion-individual performance portion of the study. The hypotheses of this study inferred a positive relationship between performance and both task and social cohesion. The data were analyzed using Pearson correlations, logistic regression, and linear stepwise regression.

Results indicated significant positive correlation and predictive relationships between team and individual performance and task cohesion. Results also indicated a significant negative correlation and predictive relationship between team and individual performance and social cohesion. Higher performing teams as well as higher performing individuals consistently rated task cohesion higher than social cohesion which suggests that team bonding around a performance goal is more important than the team bonding as a social unit for success in collegiate track and field.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
SourceDAI/A 68-12, p. , Mar 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsWomen's studies; Physical education; Higher education; Recreation and tourism
Publication Number3292652
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3292652
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.