Microsatellite analysis of the Chaetodipus californicus, in southern California
by Yamamoto, Osamu, Ph.D., LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, 2007, 97 pages; 3292130

Abstract:

Rapid urbanization in southern California has resulted in great amount of habitat loss for the organisms in the area. Among the small mammals that inhabit the area, much of the attention has been given to kangaroo rats, Dipodomys. But information regarding their sister taxa, pocket mice (both Chaetodipus and Perognathus) has been largely neglected. In this study, four populations of California pocket mice (Chaetodipus californicus) were captured and studied. First, foothills of Los Angeles and San Bernardino Mountains were surveyed using live capture traps. Second, microsatellite genetic markers were developed. Finally, population genetic data were accumulated using the microsatellites.

Total of 50 individuals of C. californicus were captured (C.c.bernardinus - 28, Cc.dispar - 22). Nine species specific microsatellite genetic markers developed and submitted to GeneBank. Among them, two were monomorphic, and two revealed excessive polymorphism. HE ranged from 0.540 to 0.958, and HO ranged from 0.000 to 0.740. Number of unique alleles ranged from 0 to 3. F ST, FIT, and FIS were 0.04758, 0.53702, and 0.51389, respectively. Although these four populations consisted of two different subspecies of C.californicus, test for population differentiation showed that they were single unit half of the time, and two distinct units one third of the time.

Since there were only five microsatellite loci screened for the analyses, result is limited in understanding the overall genetic fitness of the organisms, indication of genetic differentiation among populations were minimum. Trapping effort involving more sites, especially around the contact zones of subspecies, should proceed to further increase our knowledge base for the organism.

 
AdviserLeonard R. Brand
SchoolLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 68-11, p. , Mar 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMolecular biology; Zoology
Publication Number3292130
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3292130
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.