A qualitative study of barriers to participation in Web-based environments among learners at the community college level
by Mancuso, Sandra M., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2008, 152 pages; 3291957

Abstract:

Advancements in technology have changed the delivery of education. With the use of learning management systems, more students are able to take courses in an asynchronous environment where educators and students are separated by space and time. Although offering more flexibility, this type of learning environment may not be conducive for all learners. The general problem of this study was to identify barriers to participating in Web-based courses at the community college level that some students face. Using a qualitative study, the researcher designed a 30-item questionnaire and conducted interviews with 22 students enrolled at a community college. The study concluded that students who take face-to-face courses view the learning as a shared partnership between the instructors and themselves, unlike Web-based courses that are more self-directed. Barriers to participating in Web-based courses include the inability to have face-to-face interactions with the instructor and classmates, along with the inability to have questions answered immediately. Other barriers include the incompatibility with student learning styles and Web-based courses, a lack of understanding of Web-based courses and how they work, the perceived lack of structure of Web-based courses, the quality of Web-based courses, lack of personal motivation, and concerns with technology. Implementing standardized practices that improve the interactions between instructors and students, and standardizing the designs of Web-based courses are recommendations for improved practice. To provide a comparative analysis, replicating this study with other students at the community college level, the bachelor level, and the graduate level are recommendations for future studies. Conducting a quantitative study on the barriers to participating in Web-based courses would also offer additional comparative analysis.

 
AdviserHoward R. Jacobs
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 69-01, p. , May 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration; Teacher education; Educational technology
Publication Number3291957
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3291957
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.