Explorations in innovativeness among teachers in low-socioeconomic, high-performing elementary schools and low-socioeconomic, low-performing elementary schools
by Jackson, M. Katherine, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA, 2007, 155 pages; 3290497

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine if differences existed in teacher innovativeness in four low-socioeconomic status elementary schools. Two schools were high-performing and two schools were low-performing. Classification of performance was based upon state standards. The study explored external factors, personal characteristics, and experiences that affected the teachers' levels of innovativeness and the extent to which these factors influenced the teachers.

In this study, teachers were asked to express their attitudes and perspectives regarding innovativeness and the factors they felt affected their levels of innovativeness and the innovativeness of their schools. This study offers guidance for improving the factors that affect teacher motivation to innovate. However, rather than performance being affected by levels of teacher innovativeness, as expected, the findings of this research indicate that the primary factors affecting school performance were related to the amount of preparation for state mandated testing. This was indicated by the lack of statistically significant differences in the innovativeness of the teachers in high-performing versus low-performing schools, as measured in an Analysis of Variance. This was further supported through qualitative analysis.

The teachers offered statements for reasons they felt more or less innovative presently as opposed to when they first began teaching. They also related perceptions of the leadership displayed by their principals and environmental effects on innovativeness. State mandated testing was the most frequently stated reason for becoming less innovative. Students and the motivation teachers felt because of their concern for students were most frequently stated as the primary influencing factors for acquiring higher levels of innovativeness.

 
AdviserDaniel Surry
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA
SourceDAI/A 68-11, p. , Feb 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsElementary education; Teacher education; Educational technology
Publication Number3290497
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3290497
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.