Combat identification with synthetic aperture radar, out-of-library identification, and non-declarations
by Friend, Mark A., Ph.D., AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 164 pages; 3288578

Abstract:

Combat identification (CID) produces a mapping from data collected on detected objects to a label which identifies the object to a war fighter. Template matching classifiers perform this task through the comparison of known representations of targets of interest, called templates, with features generated from data collected on unknown objects of interest. In a forced decision scenario unknown objects are given the label of the target class associated with the template that is most similar to the unknown object. This research uses an unforced decision approach to CID. Instead of forcing a decision, objects that are unlike any used to train the classifier are labeled as out-of-library (OOL). Objects similar to more than one object represented in the library of known objects are given a non-declaration (NDEC) designation. The development of OOL and NDEC methodologies that will function well in operating conditions the classifier was not designed for, extended operating conditions, is a significant challenge and a major focus of this research.

This research develops an OOL method based on squared Mahalanobis distance scores and NDEC methodologies based on information theory. The philosophy used in this research is that OOL label assignments occur before all other labeling or non-declaration processing. Under this philosophy, the limiting effect an OOL methodology may have to classification improvements achievable with nondeclaration methods is explored.

A measure of statistical separation of in-library targets using Bhattacharyya distance is developed. This measure is used to determine the context in which a template matching classifier may experience low classification accuracy. It is found that the aspect angle the targets present to the collection platform is exploitable. Three philosophies that use knowledge of the estimated aspect angle to improve classifier performance are explored. In each philosophy classification performance improvements are achieved through modification of thresholds used by the OOL or NDEC methods to process target records collected at different aspect angles.

Experimental results demonstrate the utility of the OOL and NDEC methodologies as well as the potential gains in classifier performance achievable through context-based threshold modifications. In the experiments, a mathematical framework is used to choose the optimal classifier parameters, methodologies, and threshold adjustment methods for fixed number of observations and sensor choices while enforcing classifier performance constraints consistent with war fighter preferences.

A feature saliency method based on squared Mahalanobis distance is developed and applied to reduce the dimensionality of the input feature space. After confirmation of the feature reduction choices with the Fisher ratio, experimental results using the reduced feature space demonstrate the potential of the saliency method.

The extensibility of the developed OOL and NDEC methodologies are shown by implementing the methodologies with some modifications for use with a hidden Markov model classifier. The robustness of the methodology relative to the choice of receiver operating characteristic thresholds is demonstrated by observing the change in classification accuracy under extended operating conditions.

 
Advisor
SchoolAIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SourceDAI/B 68-11, p. , Feb 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMilitary studies; Operations research
Publication Number3288578
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3288578
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.