The impact of scaffolding type and prior knowledge in a hypermedia, problem-based learning environment
by Su, Yuyan, Ph.D., ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 144 pages; 3288016

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of scaffolding type and prior knowledge during a hypermedia supported problem-based learning program. Each of twenty intact sections of a computer literacy course was randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups - no scaffolding, content scaffolding, and metacognitive scaffolding. Three hundred and twelve undergraduate students enrolled in one of the twenty sections were randomly assigned to project teams and worked on a group project to build a personal computer by using a hypermedia supported problem-based learning program. The study examined the effects of scaffolding type and prior knowledge on individual posttest achievement, group project performance, attitudes towards the instruction, cognitive load, navigation patterns, and time in the program.

Results for achievement indicated that students in the content scaffolding treatment performed significantly better on the individual posttest than those in the metacognitive treatment. However, project teams given content scaffolds performed significantly lower on the group project than those in the no scaffolding condition. In addition to the findings for the scaffolding type, students with high prior knowledge performed significantly better on the individual posttest than those with low prior knowledge.

The attitude data revealed that students in the metacognitive scaffolding treatment reported that they performed more group behaviors than those in the content scaffolding treatment. Furthermore, high prior knowledge students had a significantly more positive attitude toward the program than low prior knowledge students.

Findings for navigation patterns indicated that students given content scaffolds visited significantly more learning resource web pages than those given metacognitive scaffolds. However, students in the content scaffolding condition visited significantly fewer hardware warehouse web pages than those in the other two treatment conditions. In addition, results revealed that students in the no scaffolding treatment spent significantly less time on the group project than those in the content scaffolding treatment and the metacognitive scaffolding treatment.

The results of this study have implications for the design and delivery of hypermedia supported problem-based learning environment. The findings suggest that content scaffolds can direct student attention to important content and encourage deep understanding. However, considerations should be given to the difficulty level of the task, the time allotted to solve the problem, and other demands students face in a problem-based environment.

 
Advisor
SchoolARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 68-11, p. , Feb 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational technology
Publication Number3288016
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3288016
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.