Development and initial validation of a self-efficacy scale for use with registered dietitians working with overweight youth
by Reinold, Christopher M., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, 2007, 164 pages; 3286366

Abstract:

This study developed and validated the Youth-Directed Obesity Counseling Self-efficacy (Y-DOCS) Scale to evaluate the self-efficacy of registered dietitians (RDs) working with childhood overweight. The specific purpose of this study was to create an evaluation instrument that can measure the effectiveness of continuing education (CE) that provides behavioral counseling training.

Two research questions guided this investigation into measuring the self-efficacy of RD’s: (a) Is the Y-DOCS scale for dietitians a reliable instrument for assessing self-efficacy among dietitians who receive training? (b) Is the Y-DOCS scale for dietitians a valid instrument for assessing self-efficacy among dietitians who receive training? The population for the study consisted of a convenience sample of 132 RDs who volunteered to take part in the survey.

Analysis revealed the Y-DOCS Scale to be a reliable and valid scale. Reliability was measured by paired sample t-tests on individual items and the entire scale, and by Cronbach’s alpha. There was no significant difference in the total item scale and the pretest-posttest correlation of the scale was .939. Cronbach’s alpha was .963 (p < 0.01). Validity was determined by expert panel review, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and ANOVA. EFA revealed a four-factor solution yielding a 19-item scale that accounted for 76% of the variance in scores. Comparison of reduced items with total item scores produced similar results with ANOVA.

EFA using orthogonal rotation suggested a four-factor solution based on Kaiser criterion and scree plot. The four identified factors were external influences, client motivation, BMI-for-age, and counseling time (Factor 1: seven items, variance = 28%, alpha = .964; Factor 2: five items, variance = 18%, alpha = .957; Factor 3: four items, variance = 16%, alpha = .955; and Factor 4: three items, variance = 13%, alpha = .955). Each factor retained high inter-item correlation.

Recommendations for use and future research are presented. Training should be designed to strengthen behavioral counseling skills by targeting the four factors identified. Future research might include confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 500-1000 participants and validation with a different cohort of health care professionals such as physicians or nurse practitioners.

 
AdviserDavid M. Macrina
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
SourceDAI/B 68-10, p. , Jan 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsNutrition; Health education
Publication Number3286366
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/3286366.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.