Health information on the Internet: Influence of online sources on credibility and behavioral intentions
by Hu, Yifeng, Ph.D., THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 179 pages; 3284942

Abstract:

Drawn from Sundar and Nass’s source typology, this dissertation examines the influences of online health information sources on users’ perceived credibility of information and behavioral intentions towards information. Specifically, it explores (a) the effect of the type of selecting source (website vs. bulletin board vs. blog vs. homepage vs. Internet), (b) the effect of the type of original source (doctor vs. layperson), and (c) the interaction between the type of original source and the type of selecting source.

Pretest 1 (N = 213) prepared two messages used in the main study. Pretest 2 (N = 16) tested the experimental stimuli. A 2 (message) × 2 (original source type) × 5 (selecting source type) full factorial experiment was conducted online among 555 randomly assigned participants.

The study yielded a significant main effect for the type of selecting source on behavioral intentions. Respondents were more likely to take action based on the information sourced from a website than from a blog, a homepage and the Internet. The effect was mediated by perceived level of gatekeeping and perceived information completeness.

The research also produced a significant two-way interaction between the type of original source and the type of selecting source on perceived credibility, mediated by perceived appropriateness of source placement. When the information was posted on a website, it was rated much higher in credibility if it was attributed to a doctor than to a layperson. When the information was presented on a homepage, it was rated slightly higher in credibility if it was attributed to a layperson than to a doctor. However, the two-way interaction differed as a function of message.

The research contributes to literature on online sources by generating a new online source typology based on perceived level of gatekeeping. In addition, it indicates that perceived level of gatekeeping predicts behavioral intentions. It reinforces dual process models by suggesting that source and source placement are powerful cues in information processing. Practical implications for online health planners, physicians, users and policy makers are discussed, followed by limitations and suggestions for future research.

 
Advisor
SchoolTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 68-10, p. , Jan 2008
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPublic health; Health education; Mass communication; Information science
Publication Number3284942
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3284942
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.