Inequitable achievement: Different admissions criteria, same predictors of degree attainment?
by Avery, Cynthia M., Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, 2007, 155 pages; 3283467

Abstract:

San Diego State University (SDSU) admits freshman under two different admissions criteria. This study examined the intra-institutional gaps in 6-year degree attainment of students admitted under the two different admissions groups. The research focused on the graduation of White, Hispanic and African American students. Specifically, this study examined the predictors of degree attainment for the fall 2001 freshmen cohort. Theoretical models of retention guided this study.

The research design includes the use of both descriptive and inferential statistics to examine hypotheses regarding student achievement. Quantitative analysis focused on extant data. Cross-tabulations identified graduation outcomes and binary logistic regression models identified predictors of graduation. Among the most significant or recurring predictors in the models were math aptitude, high school grade point average, living on campus and participation in a one-unit freshman seminar course.

A strengths-based qualitative inquiry supplemented the quantitative analysis. Interviews of African American, Hispanic and White students admitted as freshmen in fall 2001 enhanced the study. The participants gained admission to SDSU under the university's minimum admissions criteria and participated in graduation in spring 2007. The interviews explored students' perceptions of both institutional and personal factors that supported their persistence to graduation. Common supports identified through the analysis of the qualitative data included parental support, social capital, and personal qualities of self-determination and resilience.

 
AdviserJoseph F. Johnson, Jr.
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
SourceDAI/A 68-10, p. , Dec 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBlack studies; Hispanic American studies; Higher education
Publication Number3283467
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3283467
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.