When a prison comes to town: Siting, location, and perceived impacts of correctional facilities in the Midwest
by Engel, Matthew R., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN, 2007, 314 pages; 3275081

Abstract:

In the late twentieth century, the corrections sector in the United States massively increased in size and scope. This expansion was addressed in a geographical context, with a detailed description of which areas of the United States received the brunt of this expansion, and how patterns of this increase have changed over recent decades. Although metropolitan counties continue to have prisons sited in them, nonmetropolitan counties received a disproportionately large share of prisons in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Of those nonmetropolitan counties, ones with 2,500 to 19,999 urban residents had the greatest number of prisons sited in them.

Residents of six Midwestern communities with prisons were surveyed to gain an understanding of what it means for citizens to have a correctional facility as a neighbor. To gauge unfulfilled expectations, surveys were also conducted in two communities that came close to acquiring a prison but failed to do so. The surveys demonstrate that prisons were not necessarily undesired facilities that aroused a typical NIMBY response, at least in these study areas. Most of the people surveyed were in favor of the facility coming to their community. Regarding perception of results, the respondents were generally disappointed the local prison did not lead to an economic boon. However, the majority of respondents did not feel a great degree of discomfort with the nearby prison. For willing communities, the guaranteed job base and anticipated multiplier effect have shifted these facilities from something to be fought to a desired commodity.

 
AdviserDavid J. Wishart
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN
SourceDAI/A 68-07, p. , Nov 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsGeography; Criminology; Urban planning
Publication Number3275081
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3275081
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.