Mainstream social science faculty uses and attitudes toward information technologies
by Callava, Trini M., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2007, 204 pages; 3274578

Abstract:

Attitudes towards Information Technologies (IT) of mainstream Social Science faculty, known for their recalcitrance to Information Technology, were shown to impact IT use based on a sample of 91 young predominantly male highly educated faculty throughout Florida. From explanacist point of view productivity, the degree to which participants find IT efficient was found to be a good predictor of IT use. While faculties had favorable attitudes towards using IT and were trained on using computers use of IT remains low. The predominant approach to teaching strategy, instructional design, with its emphasis on rhetorical transmission of information dispensed by authority combined with logistical, epistemological, student preparation, integration and assessment barriers diminish the need for integrating IT into teaching and learning. Under this scenario it is unlikely that use of IT in instruction will grow volitionally. In a population preferring to exercise personal control using tools that are extensions of their organism discontinuous change may be necessary to become more robustly adaptive to an environment requiring faculty to be proficient in the use of IT and its integration into instruction. Enablers of use of IT in instruction should include constructivist approaches to teaching and the adoption of strategies from learning organizations. Faculty should continue to take responsibility for what and how students learn. Bilateral communication between teacher and student will remain higher education's predominant feature to nurture learning. The delivery infrastructure should support it, not be in the foreground.

 
AdviserDiane Bandow
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 68-07, p. , Nov 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMarketing; Management; Social sciences education; Educational technology
Publication Number3274578
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3274578
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.