Employee empowerment as an effective tool to increase administrative efficacy in the Local Government Area of Umunneochi, Nigeria
by Mgbeke, Darlington M., Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2007, 165 pages; 3258355

Abstract:

A lack of policy implementation, low morale, and the need for more effective engagement with administrators and workers have forced the Umunneochi Local Government Area (LGA) of Nigeria to explore effective strategies to improve its efficacy. A preliminary investigation 6 months after the introduction of employee empowerment showed that although workers wanted more decision-making authority and autonomy, administrative personnel do not have a clear understanding of employee empowerment and how it can be achieved. This descriptive case study investigated how two aspects of employee empowerment might improve administrator's efficacy in the Umunneochi LGA: the degree to which the concept is understood and the ability of administrators to implement the concept. Data from 140 written surveys were benchmarked by comparing scores to established indicators of employee empowerment. These benchmarked data were then compared to the themes that emerged from 10 in-depth interviews using the constant comparative method and these themes were then compared to the key themes emergent in the employee empowerment literature as a means of validating findings. The lack of formal education of some LGA administrators and the willingness of the dominant coalition to transfer authority were identified as barriers to understanding and implementing empowerment. It is recommended that the LGA work environment be structured in a way that links the concept of empowerment to training, awareness, top management development, and periodical performance review by an external body. From a social change perspective, the LGA may operate more effectively with increased job satisfaction, and a broadening of administrators' understanding of empowerment.

 
AdviserGary Kelsey
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 68-03, p. , Jul 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3258355
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3258355
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.