The effects of decentralization on local governance in Thailand
by Siriprakob, Prakorn, Ph.D., ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 215 pages; 3258168

Abstract:

In 1999, the Thai government enacted the Tambon Council and Tambon Administration Organization (TAO) Act (no.3) to empower local administration. Later, the Determining Plans and Process of Decentralization to Local Government Organization Act was adopted. This law updated policies on local government. This dissertation investigates the perception of public officials in three levels, small, medium, and large of Tambon Administration Organizations in Thailand regarding the effect of these Acts on local governance. In particular, effects of significant values identified from good governance principles: efficiency and effectiveness, fairness, citizen participation, responsiveness, accountability, and transparency are explored. The findings suggest that public officials viewed huge improvements in terms of overall good governance values. The new structure allows TAOs to have greater power and larger budgets to improve local infrastructure, service delivery, and citizens' well-being as never before. Citizens are given more opportunities to participate in the policy making process of TAOs through the use of village forums and oversight committee participation. TAOs are more responsive in terms of solving citizens' problems in a timelier manner. However, some traditional Thai values and practices, such as spoils and corruption practices, are still present even though there are improved mechanisms, such as oversight committees to improve the level of accountability and transparency. Overall, local governance in Thailand has taken a step in the right direction and the local administration should receive more support in the near future. The recent revolution in Thailand is expected to slow the development of local decentralization to some extent, but the long term impact remains to be seen.

 
Advisor
SchoolARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 68-04, p. , Jul 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPublic administration
Publication Number3258168
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3258168
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.