An analysis of the relationship of fear and fatalism with breast cancer screening among a selected target population of African American middle class (AAMC) women
by Talbert, Patricia Yvonne, Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2007, 146 pages; 3252461

Abstract:

The purpose of this quantitative study was to explore whether fear and fatalism influence compliance with breast cancer screening among a selected target population of African American middle class (AAMC) women. Cross-sectional analysis of a subsegment sample of 120 AAMC women ages 35 and older who reside in Minnesota were surveyed using an abridged version of the Champion Health Belief Model Scale (CHBMS), which is based on the health belief model, the Champion Breast Cancer Fear Scale (CBCFS), and an adapted version of the Powe fatalism model (PFM). These data were analyzed by applying descriptive statistics and conducting logistic regression to calculate CHBMS constructs and compare AAMC women who comply with American Cancer Society guidelines to those who are noncompliant in relation to the 2 variables fear and fatalism. Results indicated that fear (χ2 (2) = 23.49, p < .001) and fatalism (χ2 (1) = 21.04, p < .001) belief scores were statistically related to breast cancer compliance. These barriers suggest a greater need for health interventions that are culturally specific with the intention of improving the psychological aspects of health to address fear and fatalism. The social dimension of change should involve building cohesive physician-patient relationships. This action serves to counteract fear, fatalism, and negativism and increase the levels of comfort among those individuals who are more apprehensive about seeking health care services. Future research might identify strategies to address fear and develop tactful approaches to dismantle some of the philosophical doctrines associated with fatalism.

 
Advisor
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 68-02, p. , May 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBlack studies; Women's studies; Public health; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3252461
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3252461
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.