Towards an empirical assessment of multicultural competence: Construction and initial validation procedures of items for a cognitive test of multicultural knowledge
by Min, Sae-Young, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, 2007, 219 pages; 3245944

Abstract:

The Multicultural Competence (MC) movement---the movement to identify and promulgate therapist competencies that improve therapy processes and outcomes with diverse clients---has steadily gained support and acceptance within the wider psychology professions. However, nearly three decades after the inception of the movement, scholars have begun to note important limitations in the body of research on MC. Most notably, empirical studies that identify, validate, or accurately measure the MC construct are lacking. The limits of progress in these research areas have potentially jeopardized the movement to decline in influence. One of the most prominent proposed MC models, which states that MC is composed of attitudes/beliefs, knowledge, and skills has yet to be empirically validated.

The current study posits the importance of developing better tools to reflect one aspect of Multicultural Competence---Multicultural Knowledge (MK)---and presents the construction process of items and initial validation procedures. The potential uses of the proposed cognitive test of MK include its ability to provide greater empirical validation and assessment of the broader MC construct. It is posited that development of the proposed cognitive knowledge test of MK is an improvement over current methods to assess MC because existing measures rely on the self-report method. Self-reported MC measures have been limited as an accurate tool of assessing MC because scholars note their associations with related, but distinct, constructs such as social desirability. Moreover, it is believed that such self-report measures also assess one's anticipated behaviors and self-efficacy beliefs.

In order to examine the construct validity of the proposed cognitive MK items, its associations with multicultural training activities, self-assessed MC, social desirability, and self-efficacy are investigated. Results show that the sample of MK items developed had a modest, but acceptable reliability. In addition, modest construct validity was established through discriminant and criterion-related validity evidence with measures testing other constructs. The results also indicated that self-report MC measures may be a reflection primarily of self-efficacious beliefs about being able to work with cultural and ethnic minority clients, as well as a reflection of one’s positive disposition to doing so. The implications and directions for future empirical research on the MC construct are discussed.

 
AdviserMichael Furlong
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA
SourceDAI/B 67-12, p. , Jul 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBilingual education; Clinical psychology; Quantitative psychology and psychometrics
Publication Number3245944
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3245944
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.