Decision-making for roadway lane designation among variable modes
by Elshafei, Emad Hamdi, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK, 2006, 224 pages; 3241505

Abstract:

Increasing traffic congestion and a shortage of funds available to build new roads are forcing the transportation infrastructure to function at its maximum capacity. The limited road space available on congested urban street networks in major cities in the United States as well as other parts of the world, notably in Eastern Asian countries, represents a challenge to transportation planners and traffic engineers. The available road space is typically partitioned according to a variety of modes: exclusive lanes for bicycles, buses, parking lanes, etc. The current road space allocation for most urban road networks has been modified throughout the years through a process of incremental changes, each tailored to meet a specific demand or to respond to a specific change at the time.

The questions in this research are: Is there a way to provide a solution to reduce congestion with minimum resources such as pavement markings and traffic signs? Should different modes of transportation be included in roadway lane designation? What are the best possible scenarios that would provide the best measures of effectiveness? And how can transportation professionals provide a comprehensive analysis to stakeholders to allow them to make an informed decision for lane-use allocation in urban transportation networks?

The approach in this study consists of investigating what relationships exist between the lane-use allocation on one hand and the traffic flow, traffic speed, environmental impact, safety impact, mobility, and accessibility on the other. Since not all of the objectives can be transformed into a single monetary dimension, a multi-objective decision-making framework is used to compare different road-allocation scenarios. This method is employed to incorporate multiple and conflicting objectives into a process where all of them are given credence regardless of how well they can be estimated in monetary terms. Further, the suggested decision-making method includes charts as visual tools to help decision-makers understand the results of each objective when corresponding to a specific scenario. The research provides a unique application for a multimodal analysis and a decision-making method not influenced by decision-makers' input, and contributes to the transportation community efforts to improve corridor and network efficiency.

 
AdviserDavid Lovell
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK
SourceDAI/B 67-11, p. , Feb 2007
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCivil engineering; Transportation planning; Urban planning
Publication Number3241505
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3241505
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.